Posts

Showing posts from July, 2018

Cofinal set is uncountable

Consider sequences of natural numbers. We say that a sequence a majorizes b, notation a\succ b, if \lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{b_n}{a_n}=0. We call a set of sequences C cofinal if for any sequence v there is u\in C such that u majorizes v. \textbf{Statement}. Every cofinal set is uncountable. \textbf{Proof}. The proof is utilization of Cantor's diagonal argument. Assume C is a cofinal countable set, denote its elements as a^k for k=1,2,3,\ldots. First of all observe that \succ is a transitive relation and for any finite set of sequences, there is a sequence u which majorizes all of them (consider n times the pointwise maximum). Construct a sequence of sequences b^k as follows - take b^1_n=\max\{a^1_1,\ldots,a^1_n\}. Suppose we have constructed b^j for j=1,\ldots,k. Construct b^{k+1} as an nondecreasing sequence which majorizes all of a^i for i=1,\ldots,k+1 and b^j for j=1,\ldots,k. Thus b^j\succ a^j and b^{j+1}\succ b^j a...

Characterization of limit ordinals

An ordinal \alpha is limit ordinal if and only if there exists ordinal \beta such that \alpha=\omega\beta. Proof. \Leftarrow) If \beta=1 then \alpha=\omega so it is limit. Assume \omega\gamma is limit for all \gamma<\beta. We will prove that \omega\beta is limit. First assume \beta is limit. Then \omega\beta=\sup\{\omega\gamma \ \big| \ \gamma<\beta\}. Let \theta<\omega\beta, then \theta<\omega\gamma' for some \gamma'<\beta. But \omega\gamma' is limit thus \theta+1<\omega\gamma' so \theta+1<\omega\beta hence \omega\beta is limit. Now let \beta=\beta'+1 for some \beta'. Thus \omega\beta=\omega\beta'+\omega. If \theta<\omega\beta=\omega\beta'+\omega=\sup\{\omega\beta'+n\ \big| \ n<\omega\} then \theta<\omega\beta'+n_0 for some n_0. And now \theta+1<\omega\beta'+n_0+1<\sup\{\omega\beta'+n\ \big| \ n<\omega\} hence \omega\beta is limit. $\Rightarro...

Binomial identity

\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^n(-1)^{n-k}\binom{n}{k}k^j=\begin{cases} n!, & j=n\\ 0, & j=1,2,\ldots,n\end{cases} Proof. Consider the number of surjective functions f:\{1,2,\ldots,j\}\to\{1,2,\ldots,n\}. If we count them using the inclusion-exclusion principle we get the sum in the problem. On the other hand this number is trivially n! if j=n and 0 if j<n. Remark 1. For j>n we again find the number of surjections, which has a closed form form some j. Remark 2. Interesting identity which represents the above identities in a unified manner is the following \sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^{n-k}\binom{n}{k}(x+k)^n=n! for all x (in \mathbb{R} for example, but any commutative ring suffices).