Characterization of limit ordinals

An ordinal $\alpha$ is limit ordinal if and only if there exists ordinal $\beta$ such that $\alpha=\omega\beta$.

Proof. $\Leftarrow)$ If $\beta=1$ then $\alpha=\omega$ so it is limit. Assume $\omega\gamma$ is limit for all $\gamma<\beta$. We will prove that $\omega\beta$ is limit.
First assume $\beta$ is limit. Then $\omega\beta=\sup\{\omega\gamma \ \big| \ \gamma<\beta\}$. Let $\theta<\omega\beta$, then $\theta<\omega\gamma'$ for some $\gamma'<\beta$. But $\omega\gamma'$ is limit thus $\theta+1<\omega\gamma'$ so $\theta+1<\omega\beta$ hence $\omega\beta$ is limit.
Now let $\beta=\beta'+1$ for some $\beta'$. Thus $\omega\beta=\omega\beta'+\omega$. If $\theta<\omega\beta=\omega\beta'+\omega=\sup\{\omega\beta'+n\ \big| \ n<\omega\}$ then $\theta<\omega\beta'+n_0$ for some $n_0$. And now $\theta+1<\omega\beta'+n_0+1<\sup\{\omega\beta'+n\ \big| \ n<\omega\}$ hence $\omega\beta$ is limit.
$\Rightarrow)$ Let $\beta=\sup\{\gamma\ \big| \ \omega\gamma\le\alpha\}$. We have that $\omega\beta\le \alpha$. Assume $\omega\beta<\alpha$. Since $\alpha$ is limit we find that $\omega\beta+1<\alpha$ and inductively $\omega\beta+n<\alpha$ for all $n<\omega$. Hence $\omega\beta+\omega\le \alpha$. This means that $\omega(\beta+1)\le \alpha$ which is a contradiction with the definition of $\beta$.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Basel problem type sum, proposed by prof. Skordev

Evaluate $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^n n^2}.$$ Proof. The function $$S(x):=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{ n^2}$$ is well defined for $x\in[-1,1]$ and thus we need to find $S(1/2)$. Using differentiation, we observe that $$S(x)=-\int_0^x\frac{\log(1-t)}{t}\text{d}t.$$ If we make change of variables in the latter integral $t\to 1-t$ we obtain $$S(x)=-\int_{1-x}^1\frac{\log t}{1-t}\text{d}t. \ \ \ \ \ (1)$$ On the other hand, using integration by parts, we obtain $$S(x)=-\int_0^x\log(1-t)\text{d}\log t=-\log t\log(1-t)\Big|_{t=0}^x-\int_0^x\frac{\log t}{1-t}\text{d}t.$$ Notice that $\displaystyle \lim_{t\to 0}\log t \log(1-t)=0$ ($\log (1-t)\sim t$ and then L'Hopital), hence $$S(x)=-\int_0^x\log(1-t)\text{d}\log t=-\log x\log(1-x)-\int_0^x\frac{\log t}{1-t}\text{d}t. \ \ \ \ \ (2)$$ Plugging $x=1/2$ and equating $(1)$ to $(2)$ we obtain $$\int_{1/2}^1\frac{\log(1-t)}{t}\text{d} t-\int_{0}^{1/2}\frac{\log(1-t)}{t}\text{d} t= \log\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2.$$ On the ot...
Read more

A problem proposed by prof. Babev

Consider the sequence $$a_n=\int_{n}^{n+1}\frac{\sin^2(\pi t)}{t}\text{d}t.$$ It could be proven that $$\lim_{n\to \infty}n a_n=\frac{1}{2}$$  Now we are going to prove that $$\lim_{n\to\infty}n\left(na_n-\frac{1}{2}\right)=-\frac{1}{4} $$ and show how to derive all such limits. $\textbf{Proof.}$ Since $\displaystyle\int_{n}^{n+1}\sin^2(\pi t)\text{d}{t}=\frac{1}{2}$ (for any $n\in \mathbb{N}$) we can rewrite the limit in question as $$\lim_{n\to \infty}n\left(n\left(\int_{n}^{n+1}\frac{\sin^2(\pi t)}{t}\text{d}t-\int_{n}^{n+1}\frac{\sin^2(\pi t)}{n}\text{d}t\right)\right)=\lim_{n\to \infty}n^2\left(\int_{n}^{n+1}\sin^2(\pi t)\left(\frac{1}{t}-\frac{1}{n}\right)\text{d}t\right)$$ $$=\lim_{n\to \infty}n\left(\int_{n}^{n+1}\sin^2(\pi t)\frac{n-t}{t}\text{d}t\right)$$ Changing the variables $t\to n+s$ and using periodicity of sine, the last simplifies to $$ \lim_{n\to \infty}n\int_{0}^{1}\sin^2(\pi s)\frac{-s}{n+s}\text{d}s$$ Since for $s\in[0,1]$, $\displaystyle \...
Read more

Modification on a sequence from VJIMC

The first two limits of the following problem were proposed at VJIMC, 2005, Category I. The exact value of the last limit was proposed by a user at https://artofproblemsolving.com , where you can also see his solution along other lines.  Let $(x_n)_{n\ge 2}$ be a sequence of real numbers, such that $x_2>0$ and for every $n\ge 2$ holds  $$x_{n+1}=-1+\sqrt[n]{1+nx_n}.$$ Prove consecutively that  $$1)\ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n=0,\  \ \ 2)\ \lim_{n\to\infty}nx_n=0,\  \ \ 3)\ \lim_{n\to\infty}n^2x_n=4.$$ $\textbf{Proof.}$  $\textbf{1)}$ Clearly all the elements of the sequence are positive. The inequality $-1+\sqrt[n]{1+nx_n}<x_n$ is equivalent to $(1+nx_n)<(1+x_n)^n$, which is seen to be true after expanding, since all the summands on the right are positive. This shows that the sequence is strictly decreasing. Hence $$0<x_{n+1}=-1+\sqrt[n]{1+nx_n}\le -1+\sqrt[n]{1+nx_2},$$ and since the right hand side clearly tends to $0$ we obtain $\displaystyle\lim_...
Read more